BPC-157 vs TB-500 Dosage: Side by Side

BPC-157 and TB-500 compared on the record: molecules, the one head-to-head study (32 rats), circulating amounts and what each looks like in units.

Medibact Guides · Published 2026-10-01 · Updated 2026-10-17

Illustration: Two clear glass vials with different lyophilized powders, each with an insulin syringe.
Illustration

BPC-157 and TB-500 are compared constantly and studied together almost never. Both are sold for the same imagined job — tissue repair — so the question "which one" is natural. The record behind the answer is thin in a specific way: each compound has a pile of animal work and no randomised human trial, and exactly one published experiment has put them side by side. This page lays out that record, the amounts that circulate for each, and how those amounts read on a syringe. It recommends neither.

The single-compound figures are on the BPC-157 dosage page and the TB-500 dosage page. Using the two together is a different question, covered on the BPC-157 and TB-500 guide. When both come pre-mixed in one vial, the per-peptide water and unit arithmetic is on the Wolverine blend reconstitution page. Routes and sites for the second compound are covered separately in TB-500 injection sites and routes.

Two different kinds of molecule

BPC-157 TB-500
What it is 15-residue synthetic peptide, first described from a gastric protein Described by vendors as residues 17–23 of thymosin beta-4 (LKKTETQ); the full protein is 43 residues
Human injectable data One retrospective chart review of knee injections, 17 patients, no dose stated (PMID 34324435) Only for the full protein: 42–1,260 mg intravenously in healthy volunteers (PMID 20536472), not the fragment
PubMed, title or abstract (2026-10-01) 226 records, 0 randomised trials 33 records naming TB-500; 602 naming thymosin beta-4
ClinicalTrials.gov (2026-10-01) 4 records 1 record naming TB-500; 18 for thymosin beta-4
FDA compounding status Category 2 from 2023-09-29, withdrawn nomination by 2026-04-22; advisory vote 8–6–1 in favour, 2026-07-23 Same, listed as "Thymosin Beta-4, Fragment (LKKTETQ)"

The TB-500 row carries a trap: most of the human data people cite for "TB-500" is for thymosin beta-4, a molecule six times longer. The fragment itself has no human dosing study.

The one head-to-head experiment

Twelve PubMed records name both compounds. Nine are 2026 reviews or overviews, one is a doping-analysis method, one is the 2021 BPC-157 knee chart review — and one is an experiment. Biçer and colleagues (Joint Diseases and Related Surgery, July 2026, PMID 42542926) cut and repaired the Achilles tendon in 32 male rats and randomised them into four groups of eight:

Group Amount Tendon strength vs control Histology (total scores)
BPC-157 10 µg/kg/day Higher, not significant Numerically better, not significant
TB-500 60 µg/kg/day Higher, significant (p < 0.05) Significantly better on both scores
Both Same amounts combined — Significantly better on one score; no gain over either alone
Control — — —

The authors call it exploratory, and the limits are plain: eight animals per group, one injury model, four weeks, injection into the abdominal cavity rather than under the skin, and one amount of each compound. It is still the only controlled comparison anywhere in the record. Neither compound has a measured oral bioavailability either; the BPC-157 side of that gap is on the capsules-versus-injection page.

The rat amounts, scaled for scale

FDA's 2005 guidance on first-in-human starting doses converts a rat dose to a human-equivalent dose by dividing mg/kg by 6.2 (Table 1, body-surface-area method). Applied to the head-to-head study:

Rat, per kg per day Human-equivalent, per kg 80 kg adult
BPC-157 10 µg 1.6 µg about 130 µg
TB-500 60 µg 9.7 µg about 770 µg

This is arithmetic, not a dose. The FDA method exists to estimate a cautious starting point for a first human trial, and the study it is applied to measured tendons, not people.

What circulates, per injection and per week

Vendor, clinic and forum pages read for this site on 2026-09-18 describe the two very differently:

Per injection Frequency Per week
BPC-157 250–500 µg Once or twice daily 1.75–7 mg
TB-500 2–2.5 mg Twice weekly, then weekly or fortnightly 4–5 mg (loading phase)

Per injection the circulating TB-500 amount is four to ten times the BPC-157 amount; per week the ranges overlap. Neither set of figures traces to a label, a trial or a paper — they are what circulates, reported as such.

Both in syringe units

Units on a U-100 syringe = mg ÷ mg/mL × 100. Research vials of both are commonly labelled 5 mg and 10 mg.

Amount 2.5 mg/mL (5 mg + 2 mL) 5 mg/mL (5 mg + 1 mL or 10 mg + 2 mL) 10 mg/mL (10 mg + 1 mL)
BPC-157 250 µg 10 units 5 units 2.5 units
BPC-157 500 µg 20 units 10 units 5 units
TB-500 2 mg 80 units 40 units 20 units
TB-500 2.5 mg 100 units 50 units 25 units

The two sit at opposite ends of the syringe. BPC-157's amounts are small enough that dilute mixing is what keeps them on readable marks; TB-500's are large enough that dilute mixing fills a whole 1 mL syringe. A 5 mg vial holds twenty 250 µg amounts of BPC-157 but only two 2.5 mg amounts of TB-500. Water volumes per vial are on BPC-157 reconstitution; the calculator's BPC-157 and TB-500 settings work any vial.

What is not established

No human trial has compared BPC-157 with TB-500, and neither has a randomised human trial of its own. The rat study used one amount of each, by a route people do not use, for four weeks. No human dose of the TB-500 fragment has been studied at all. Nothing on this page is a dose, a choice between the two or a plan. The compounds are covered in Medibact's BPC-157 guide and TB-500 guide.

Sources and dates

Opened 2026-10-01: PubMed searches and record summaries via NCBI E-utilities (counts above, and the 12 records naming both); abstracts PMID 42542926 (Biçer et al. 2026), 34324435 (Lee and Padgett 2021) and 20536472 (Ruff et al. 2010); ClinicalTrials.gov v2 searches for BPC-157, TB-500 and thymosin beta 4; FDA, Guidance for Industry: Estimating the Maximum Safe Starting Dose in Initial Clinical Trials for Therapeutics in Adult Healthy Volunteers (2005), Table 1. FDA's Category 2 listing, the 2026-07-23 advisory vote and the circulating amounts as recorded on this site's BPC-157 and TB-500 dosage pages (read 2026-09-18). Human-equivalent figures, weekly totals and units are arithmetic by this site. Corrections go to the contact page.

Frequently asked questions

Which is better, BPC-157 or TB-500?

No human trial has compared them, and neither has a randomised human trial of its own. The one direct comparison is a 2026 rat Achilles-tendon study of 32 animals, in which TB-500 reached statistical significance on tendon strength and BPC-157 did not, and the two together did no better than either alone. A single rat study cannot rank two compounds for people.

Why are TB-500 amounts so much larger than BPC-157 amounts?

The figures that circulate — about 2 to 2.5 mg of TB-500 per injection against 250 to 500 µg of BPC-157 — are not sourced to any trial. The one comparative animal study also used six times more TB-500 than BPC-157 per kilogram (60 against 10 µg/kg/day), but gave no reason tied to human dosing.

Can BPC-157 and TB-500 be used together?

They are commonly sold and discussed together; the combination is covered on this site's BPC-157 and TB-500 guide. In the only experiment that tested the combination, in rats, it gave no additional benefit over either compound alone. No human study of the combination exists.

How many units is 250 mcg of BPC-157 or 2 mg of TB-500?

Units on a U-100 syringe equal milligrams divided by concentration in mg/mL, times 100. 250 mcg (0.25 mg) of BPC-157 is 10 units at 2.5 mg/mL and 5 units at 5 mg/mL; 2 mg of TB-500 is 40 units at 5 mg/mL and 80 units at 2.5 mg/mL.

Are BPC-157 and TB-500 legal?

Neither is an approved drug. FDA placed both in Category 2 of its interim compounding list in September 2023, and its list page (content current 2026-04-22) now shows both as withdrawn nominations; in July 2026 its advisory committee voted 8 to 6, with one abstention, in favour of each, which is advice and not an approval. Details are on each compound's dosage page.